Organizational Behavior and Management Essay

In cover the Managers Hot Seat Working in ag meeting ups Cross-Functional, I was able to distinguish the difference in the midst of the words group and team bring in. Team refers to a sm in all group of race with complementary skills, who work unitedly to achieve a sh ared purpose and hold themselves mutually responsible for performance results ( Schermerhorm,2011). In this video, yes thither was team that consisted of genus Rosa Denson, Cheng Jing, Simon Mahoney and Joe Tanney who plays the role of team leader for an indicateed high priority project.Working in teams is ingrained in this age of rapidly changing technology, market-driven decision making, customer sophistication, and employee reposelessness, as leaders and managers are faced with tender challenges . Organizations mustiness build new structures and master new skills in rule to compete and survive. And in order to increase efficiency and ticklish-hittingness, a group effort is required as it reads in the article MindTools.In the video, the members work in the same organisation but at different departmental levels with different knowledge and skills. How these state interact and relate to one another is a gravestone cistron in determining how successful the team will be at achieving its mission The group is made up of cross functional team members where there is input from people with a mixture of gender, race, age and ethnicity. It gouge be difficult managing a group like this because there are individual differences amongst each member.People vary among the layers of diversity 1) personality, which is unique to every individual, 2) internal dimensions which is race and age, 3) external dimensions which includes religion and marital status and 4) organizational dimensions much(prenominal) as job title(McGraw Hill, 2007) These factors are likely to influence social relationships and the ability to work with others. Working together is part of many organizations that bank tha t by practicing teamwork skills can help produce demote products and provide better services, faster and at a lower cost.However, there was no usher of teamwork in this video. There was no defined process of people working(a) together to accomplish a common goal, which is the definition of teamwork. Instead there was a group of knowledgeable people, who did not want responsibility and had no initiative for such project. In fact, Tuckmans group development pose should have been added to the agenda as a refresher course for all members. Schermerhorn defines Tuckmans development feigning in stages.Stage 1 of the model is forming, and this was evident in the beginning of the meeting with the initial formation of the group discussing where tasks are understood by members and resources and information that delegated by the leader, in this compositors case Joe. But it wasnt long into the meeting where storming was evident. Individuals began to question and challenge the habituated t ask. Members disagree on the goal of the team and resist the given task. At this point personal to emotional excuses began to surface. I do not study I witnessed the rest of the stages, except the adjourning part.There was no norming stage where the team moves toward harmonious working practices where there is agreement. In fact, Joe the acting leader had to assign different tasks according to his perception of each one. And there was no performing stage displaying functional, interdependent roles that were focused on the performance of the group tasks among the members. In fact, group cohesiveness was not evident, with everyone having an agenda of their own, the interaction and motivation between them was very low. The cohesiveness that should have bonded the small group together and make love up with solutions for the problem was not evident.The book states that in order for effective teams to thrive these factors need to be established and be in space achieve and economise hi gh levels of task performance achieve and maintain high levels of member satisfaction and retain viability for the future (Schermerhorn, 2011) . With this said, the benefits of effective work teams within an organization are very considerable, and it takes a lot of hard work and dedication on the part of management and team members to develop, experience and maintain effective work teams.I believe that the team in the video is not team, but rather a group of people discussing an organizations project based on the fact that there was no committedness to the task at hand. Every member in an organization has a task to do. These roles are the expected behaviors for a given position in an organization. Sometimes roles can disrupt group progress and weaken its cohesion. For example, Rosa demonstrated role conflict when she involved her personal life with her job. She was a self-confessor, disclosing personal feelings and issues.Simon was the opinion giver, expressing his own personal op inions as to why such project has not worked before without offering solutions. Simon can also be labeled a blocker. Joe was the initiator or contributor to the team. He would declare oneself new ideas of getting the project completed by finding solutions to the problems the rest of the team members would come up with. The creation of teams has become a key strategy in many organizations. Team building is an essential ingredient in supporting and improving the effectiveness of small groups and task forces and must be a key part of a total weapons platform of organizational change.