A Case for Open Borders Essay -- Human Right Argumentative Persuasive

A Case for Open Borders In his address to a joint session of Congress on January 8, 1918, President Woodrow Wilson decl bed e forgivingcipation of the seas in times of peace and war. Looking back, it seems ridiculous to think that any ane could repugn the unspoilt of individuals to navigate the oceans freely. However, fast-forward to the twenty-first century and we can see an correspondent debate over the issue of immigration sounds, with territorial borders being the principal(prenominal) topic of discussion. The system of immigration in the United States is complex and often restrictive, and while revisions to the system usually include increasing quotas or different solutions to let in certain groups of people who deserve special servant (such as those whose skills are needed in a particular field), they are still very limited solutions. The obvious question that arises from letting in some people but not differents is that of fairness. Is the accident of birth or l uck of being in the right place at the right time enough to justify restrictive citizenship to a select few? I would argue not. I intend to argue that a commission to man rights entails the position that borders ought to be surface in order to promise other homo rights, especially the right to migrate.In order to experience why a commitment to human rights includes a commitment to open borders, we mustiness understand why the right to migrate is a human right. This can be proven with a simple logical syllogism. We must first assume that all individuals have equal natural rights in the state of natural law, or the very primitive sense of man before government was formed. Locke defines the state of natural law as a state of equality all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one h... ...of his statement, however, Walzer is claiming that fulfilling this urgent need (or right) should only be done if it is convenient to the other party. This is a contradiction to human righ ts, as they should be inherent and not granted but demanded without embarrassment or shame . Indeed, restricting borders is the exploit of convenience and if it is done for reasons other than emergencies (such as possible spread of infectious diseases) is a violation of a human beings right to migrate. Giving rights to citizens for the sole reason of being citizens and denying citizenship to some effectively denies rights to that group. military man rights belong to individuals, not citizens. Humanity has faced so many obstacles to human rights that it will surely transcend lines on maps, because we are committed to human rights and this entails a commitment to a position of open borders.