Case About Anthony Tan

telegraphic Summary of Case Anthony common topaz was one of the most wanted work force as he was allegedly charged for murder of Bosnian refugee and Rebels bikie, Edin Boz Smajovic. aft(prenominal) 2 years building an export business in Vietnam, he read a media report from NSW, describing him as one of the states most wanted men. He was unaware for 2 years of the patrol hunt for him. He immediately got on the phone, first his lawyer, then to an airline. He was more than willing to return to Australia to fight his allegations.In the end he was arrested and charged for the murder and held on remand in prison for over a year. When he granted bail in August, his trial was to start that resembling week. Both Anthony Tan and co- impeach Nathan Keith Reddy and taken to court. Once the circumstance reached the self-governing accost, the cutting was dismissed even forwards the trial had started. This was because, it was understood that the case failed part due to an alleged conf ession from a prosecution witness. Jurisdictions of all courts tortuous The two courts involved in this case were the Central Local coquet and the Supreme Court. The jurisdictions for the local court include the majority of whitlow, summary prosecutions in NSW and with civil matters up to $100,000. It in addition guide ons committal proceedings to determine whether or non indictable offences are to be committed to the District and Supreme Court. Meanwhile the jurisdictions for the Supreme Court has unlimited civil jurisdictions and handles claims of more than $750,000. It also deals with the most serious criminal matters, including murder and treason.The initial court for this case (Central Local Court) had refused bail, but when it reached the Supreme Court, the case was dismissed even before the trail had even started. Area of law The Anthony Tan case was a exoteric, criminal case, as Anthony allegedly broke the criminal law, which is part of the public law (also known as t he Common law). The standard of verification is the gist of evidence which a plaintiff or prosecuting attorney, in a criminal case, must be presented in a trial in decree to win.As for a civil case the standard of proof is generally that the plaintiff must prove this case by majority (51%) of the evidence. The standard of proof for this case was it was beyond average doubt. The standard of proof needed for a criminal case is that there must be no reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime in order to inpatient the defendant. The standard of proof in this criminal case, which resulted in the freedom of Mr. Tan, was an alleged confession from a prosecution witness, which led to the case to fail.Was a gore used? Why or why not? A panel is usually used in the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court judge had dismissed the case on technical terms, therefore a jury was not needed. It was an interesting case due to the fact that Tan was innocent yet held in jail for more than 1 year. This had a major impact on Anthony Tans life, reputation and his future. For a case that would of continued in the Supreme Court, a jury would wipe out been selected, but due to the fact that the case was dismissed, a jury was not needed.Is a jury effective? A jury is a root of citizens (usually of 12) who hears the testimony in legal disputes and determines what they believe is the truth. The word jury is derived from the cut word jurer, which means, to swear an oath. The jury has generally been successful because their peers judge the accused and the public plays a role in the criminal justice organization, as they make the community live as though they have a voice in situations that concern society at large.The jury is there to represent a cross-section of society and they provide a clasp of perceptions. Also the responsibility for the verdict is spread across 12 jurors and the system acts as a safety net against corrupt and oppressive conduct by state and/or police force. The jury is also carefully selected to avoid bias, prejudice, racist, sexist or any other form of discrimination, which stick out influence the verdict. Also the defense council can remove a juror, if they feel uncomfortable with them being in the jury.