Urie Bronfenbrenner's Theory Of Ecological Development

Running head : Urie Bronfenbrenner sUrie Bronfenbrenner s Ecological Theory of HumanDevelopmentZack ChaikinCapella UniversityHuman Development HS 5003Dr . Pietrzak4 /18 /2009AbstractThe work of Urie Bronfenbrenner is c in alled an ecological theory of evolution a good example to examine the various interactions mingled with the developing chela from agnatic relationships to the sidestep , social settings , cultural influences and economic factors . There argon quadruple levels of environmental influences the micro- , meso- , exo- and macro schemas , each nested inwardly one other representing degrees of internal interactions . Change and constancy atomic number 18 mediated by the passage of time , the chronosystem . Athe author s life events leading up to incoming graduate school argon illustrated done interaction s within the ecological modelBronfenbrenner s Ecological Theory of DevelopmentThe ecological model knowing by Bronfenbrenner was a response to what the source himself described as the science of the oddish appearance of children in strange situations with strange adults for the briefest periods of time (Bronfenbrenner , 1977 ,p .513 ) In time Bronfenbrenner s efforts helped nominate a dead body of research reflecting humanity schooling from real-life situations in real-life settings . This will all overturn deeper into Bronfenbrenner s ecological theory of development , system by system , how it relates to the authors personal development , specifically those life events leading to entering graduate school for a Masters in counselingBronfenbrenner states that human development takes place through interactions in the midst of the single(a) and the environment , defined as persons , objects and symbols in the persons adjacent world . These interactions are two-way , that is the individual acts upon the environment! and the environment acts on the individual . These events are most effective over long , unchanging periods of time Bronfenbrenner terms these most intimate and enduring interactions as proximal processes (Bronfenbrenner , 1993 . An infant cries , the parent responds .

These responses are critical with rate with to its duration , frequency , stability (is it discontinue or drawn- come out of the closet intensity and with proper timing (Bronfenbrenner , Evans 2000 . This preposition has been borne out , as consistently high levels of mother-child interaction has resulted in deject incidences of problem behavi or in lower-class families (Bronfenbrenner , 1994Indeed , higher acquisition outcomes have been seen in higher-class more stable environments . The author was raised in a middle-class urban neighborhood , an hardly child (as the child is the epicenter of the ecological model , all the more so , a stay at crime syndicate m other and a father who came home quotidian at symmetric hours . The author was an beforehand(predicate) memorizeer due to being get a line to and encouragement to read alone . The author was not considered a behavior problem by parents or teachers . Becoming an archeozoic reader also fostered an enjoyment of learning and an enduring bosom of curiosityBased on Lewin s field theory (Vander Zanden 2007 ,.54 , the ecological model is designed as a series of nested structures , with the child always at the center . The innermost , the microsystem is essentially comprised of the face to face interactions between the child and his environment . These inte ractions are prolonged and complex , as befitting...I! f you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper